

|
The Prince (Paperback)
by Niccolo Machiavelli
Category:
Politics, Power, Strategy for Success |
Market price: ¥ 78.00
MSL price:
¥ 68.00
[ Shop incentives ]
|
Stock:
In Stock |
MSL rating:
Good for Gifts
|
MSL Pointer Review:
A realistic map of how power is achieved and maintained. |
If you want us to help you with the right titles you're looking for, or to make reading recommendations based on your needs, please contact our consultants. |
 Detail |
 Author |
 Description |
 Excerpt |
 Reviews |
|
|
Author: Niccolo Machiavelli
Publisher: Bantam Classics
Pub. in: August, 1984
ISBN: 0553212788
Pages: 176
Measurements: 6.9 x 4.2 x 0.5 inches
Origin of product: USA
Order code: BA00127
Other information:
|
Rate this product:
|
- Awards & Credential -
One of the best known and most studied writings on power and strategy, often regarded as the Western counterpart of The Art of the War. |
- MSL Picks -
One of history’s greatest political philosophers, Niccolò Machiavelli is notorious for his treatise The Prince, which has become a cornerstone of modern political theory. Written in 1513 and published in 1532, after Machivelli’s death, The Prince immediately provoked controversy that has continued unabated to this day.
Defining human nature as inherently selfish, Machiavelli proposes that social conflict and violence are natural phenomena that help determine the ablest, most versatile form of government. Asserting that idealism has no place in the political arena, The Prince primarily addresses a monarch’s difficulties in retaining authority. Considered the first expression of political realism, it has often been accused of advocating a political philosophy in which “the end justifies the means.” Indeed the emphasis in The Prince on practical success, at the expense even of traditional moral values, earned Machiavelli a reputation for ruthlessness, deception, and cruelty. Many scholars contend, however, that the author’s pragmatic views of ethics and politics reflected the realities of his time, as exemplified by the Medici family of Florence.
Debates about Machiavelli’s theories are as lively today as they were 450 years ago, but no one questions the importance of his fundamental contribution to Western political thought. This newly translated edition also includes Machiavelli’s Letter to Francesco Vettori, The Life of Castruccio Castracani, and excerpts from the Discourses on Livy.
Target readers:
Those who want to delve into the core of politics and those who want to protect themselves by understanding more of political games.
|
Niccolo Machiavelli was born on May 3, 1469, in Florence, Italy. He eventually became a man who lived his life for politics and patriotism. Right now, however, he is associated with corrupt, totalitarian government. The reason for this is a small pamphlet he wrote called The Prince to gain influence with the ruling Medici family in Florence. The political genius of Niccolo Machiavelli was overshadowed by the reputation that was unfairly given to him because of a misunderstanding of his views on politics.
Machiavelli's life was very interesting. He lived a nondescript childhood in Florence, and his main political experience in his youth was watching Savanarola from afar. Soon after Savanarola was executed, Machiavelli entered the Florentine government as a secretary. His position quickly rose, however, and was soon engaging in diplomatic missions. He met many of the important politicians of the day, such as the Pope and the King of France, but none had more impact on him than a prince of the Papal States, Cesare Borgia. Borgia was a cunning, cruel man, very much like the one portrayed in The Prince. Machiavelli did not truly like Borgia's policies, but he thought that with a ruler like Borgia the Florentines could unite Italy, which was Machiavelli's goal throughout his life. Unfortunately for Machiavelli, he was dismissed from office when the Medici came to rule Florence and the Republic was overthrown. The lack of a job forced him to switch to writing about politics instead of being active. His diplomatic missions were his last official government positions.
When Machiavelli lost his office, he desperately wanted to return to politics. He tried to gain the favor of the Medici by writing a book of what he thought were the Medici's goals and dedicating it to them. And so The Prince was written for that purpose. Unfortunately, the Medici didn't agree with what the book said, so he was out of a job. But when the public saw the book, they were outraged. The people wondered how cruel a man could be to think evil thoughts like the ones in The Prince, and this would come back to haunt him when he was alive and dead. However, if the people wanted to know what Machiavelli really stood for, they should have read his "Discourses on Livy", which explain his full political philosophy. But not enough people had and have, and so the legacy of The Prince continues to define Machiavelli to the general public.
A few years later the Medici were kicked out of Florence. The republic was re-established, and Machiavelli ran to retake the office he had left so many years ago. But the reputation that The Prince had established made people think his philosophy was like the Medici, so he was not elected. And here the sharp downhill of his life began. His health began to fail him, and he died months later, in 1527.
Machiavelli had been unfairly attacked all of his life because of a bad reputation. But it only got worse after he died. He was continually blasted for his "support" of corrupt ruling. In fact, Machiavellian now means corrupt government. Only recently has his true personality come to light. The world must change it's vision of the cold, uncaring Machiavelli to the correct view of a patriot and a political genius.
|
Need to seize a country? Have enemies you must destroy? In this handbook for despots and tyrants, the Renaissance statesman Machiavelli sets forth how to accomplish this and more, while avoiding the awkwardness of becoming generally hated and despised.
"Men ought either to be well treated or crushed, because they can avenge themselves of lighter injuries, of more serious ones they cannot; therefore the injury that is to be done to a man ought to be of such a kind that one does not stand in fear of revenge."
For nearly 500 years, Machiavelli's observations on Realpolitik have shocked and appalled the timid and romantic, and for many his name was equivalent to the devil's own. Yet, The Prince was the first attempt to write of the world of politics as it is, rather than sanctimoniously of how it should be, and thus The Prince remains as honest and relevant today as when Machiavelli first put quill to parchment, and warned the junior statesman to know how to do wrong, and to make use of it or not according to necessity.
|
The Prince by Niccolo Machiavelli
Seventeenth Chapter: Concerning Cruelty and Clemency, and Whether It Is Better to Be Loved Than Feared
...Upon this a question arises: whether it be better to be loved than feared or feared than loved? It may be answered that one should wish to be both, but, because it is difficult to unite them in one person, it is much safer to be feared than loved, when, of the two, either must be dispensed with. Because this is to be asserted in general of men, that they are ungrateful, fickle, false, cowardly, covetous, and as long as you succeed, they are yours entirely; they will offer you their blood, property, life, and children, as is said above, when the need is far distant; but when it approaches they turn against you. And that prince, who, relying entirely on their promises, has neglected other precautions, is ruined; because friendships that are obtained by payments, and not by greatness or by nobility of mind, may indeed be earned, but they are not secured, and in time of need cannot be relied upon; and men have less scruple in offending one who is beloved than one who is feared, for love is preserved by the link of obligation which, owing to the baseness of men, is broken at every opportunity for their advantage; but fear preserves you by a dread of punishment which never fails.... Twenty-First Chapter: How a Prince Should Conduct Himself So as to Gain Renown ...A prince is also respected when he is either a true friend or a downright enemy, that is to say, when, without any reservation, he declares himself in favor of one party against the other; which course will always be more advantageous than standing neutral; because if two of your powerful neighbors come to blows, they are of such a character that, if one of them conquers, you have either to fear him or not. In either case it will always be more advantageous for you to declare yourself and to make war strenously; because, in the first case, if you do not declare yourself, you will invariably fall a prey to the conqueror, to the pleasure and satisfaction of his who has been conquered, and you will have no reasons to offer, nor anything to protect or to shelter you. Because he who conquers does not want doubtful friends who will not aid him in the time of trial; and he who loses will not harbor you because you did not willingly, sword in hand, court his fate....
Translation by: W.K. Marriott
|
|
View all 12 comments |
Bill Slocum (MSL quote), USA
<2006-12-27 00:00>
Niccolo Machiavelli is created with laying the foundation for modern statecraft; certainly you have to admire his stones.
Sitting in comfortable but barren exile, he wrote a how-to manual to the polity that disposed of him, presuming to explain to Lorenzo di Medici how his kinsmen messed up Italy. He spends five-sixths of the book calling out the mistakes of others, then devotes the rest to plead for a job. If some scholars are to be believed, he even makes passing, jesting mention to the fact the Medicis tortured him for his presumed republican allegiances: "I will not here speak of republics, having already treated of them fully in another place," is how he begins Chapter 2.
Machiavelli got some piecework for his troubles, but never managed a return to grace. But like a phrase from a book "The Prince" famously spurns, the stone the builders rejected became the cornerstone. Machiavelli is the Big Daddy of realpolitick, must reading for even the most dovish of diplomats. The nobles he mentions in the book, distant beacons he aspired to serve, today are best remembered for peopling Machiavelli's book.
So what about that book? "The Prince" is enjoyably bitter and pungent fare, every paragraph seemingly polished for inclusion in Bartletts or the Cynics Handbook. Reformers should know that no deed goes unpunished; "on every opportunity for attacking the reformer, his opponents do so with the zeal of partisans, the others only defend him half-heartedly, so that between them he runs great danger." Occupiers of Iraq may not be Machiavellian enough, hunkered down in the Green Zone rather than heeding Niccolo's words about "although you may have fortresses, they will not save you if you are hated by the people." (Of course, Machiavelli's ideas for subduing a restive populace would not go over well on CNN.)
Machiavelli may have been a misread humanist somewhat lost in translation, as some here argue, but it's hard to match that with his warning against princes who wish to be good. "Therefore it is necessary for a prince, who wishes to maintain himself, to learn how not to be good, and to use this knowledge and not use it according to the necessity of the case."
"The Prince" is great bedside company for the chronically bitter. Machiavelli was clearly smarting from his hurts, both as an out-of-work diplomat and a man without a country, and the wisdom he draws upon is the sort one will recognize especially acutely during the low moments of his or her life.
I can't say I'm all that won over by Machiavelli's wisdom, though. His use of Cesare Borgia as the ultimate prince is famously not borne out by history, and there's a scattershot selection of Roman emperors offered up near the end, in which he enthuses about the nastiness of some and deplores the milk of human kindness in others, then acknowledges nearly all of the bad emperors mentioned (like Commodus of "Gladiator" fame) came to bad ends. "In both ways there were some who had a fortunate and others an unfortunate ending," Machiavelli concludes, his book's weakest moment.
"The Prince" is a brave book, though, with a lot of sharp points; you can see the merits in his various arguments without agreeing with them. One senses any prince would be better-armed with this book in their library; were it the only book he ever read, he'd probably find the sharpest point to be the pike his head rested upon. |
A reader (MSL quote), USA
<2006-12-27 00:00>
Niccol Machiavelli's book The Prince is one of the most important political works in history. Many politicians and businessmen throughout the ages have used Machiavelli's practical political advice to their advantage. If one is looking for entertainment, look elsewhere; however, for the sheer wealth of political advice and commentary that Machiavelli brings forth in The Prince, it is definitely worth reading for anyone, especially for those with an interest in politics.
Many ideas and references to The Prince can be seen today. The term "Machiavellian" is by far the most often used reference to The Prince today. The term is used in our culture to describe unscrupulous politicians; however, a careful reading of The Prince shows that, although advising such amoral ways of ruling, Machiavelli himself was not crooked, but rather was making commentary on politics. An example is Machiavelli's comment about war, "they [the Romans] knew that war may not be avoided but is deferred to the advantage of others."
The Prince is of interest historically because of the numerous references to events that demonstrate Machiavelli's point. However, The Prince is also relevant in today's world as the reader considers events that have happened since the writing of The Prince that demonstrate Machiavelli's points. Ultimately, The Prince is a great book worth reading for anyone. In the midst of all the political advice, Machiavelli even gives you a little personal advice, "He should do as prudent archers do when the place they plan to hit appears to [sic] distant... they set their aim much higher than the place intended..."
|
Joseph M (MSL quote), USA
<2006-12-27 00:00>
The Prince by Niccolo Machiavelli is considered by some to be a dictator's handbook. With this knowledge going in, I thought I would be reading a Mein Kampf of sorts. I was wrong. Machiavelli writes matter-of-factly about simply how a Prince should keep power over his citizens.
This originally was not even meant to be published. Machiavelli wrote it to get a job with Lorenzo de' Medici of Florence from which Machiavelli was recently expelled, when the French conquered it several years earlier. Machiavelli was once an ambassador to France and was able to observe how princes obtained power. This was a sample of his knowledge, so that Lorenzo would be impressed. It worked. Another goal of this book was to unite Italy. This goal was not achieved for another 350 years.
The 70-odd pages makes this a brisk read (to put it mildly).
The book starts off with the various types of princedoms around the world and the advantages and disadvantages to each.
This is followed by historical examples of princedoms that held power well. Then Machiavelli talks how a prince should address certain problems such as: how a prince should be looked at, how to get an army together, how to rule foreign colonies, how to create an image of yourself, how to worship, who you should surround yourself by. This is followed by calling for the different city-states of Italy (it is 1510) to unite.
The Prince talks a lot about Ceasar Borgia, his "ideal" prince.
The book may be 500 years old, but it is not dated. This is a great read for any person interested in politics (and you can see were every dictator went wrong).
|
Simon Cleveland (MSL quote), USA
<2006-12-27 00:00>
There are several classical books that withstood the test of time and in one way or another deserve attention. One of them is "The Prince". Why? Its applicability to the democratic state remains a question, however I'm sure politicians read it for how to make one nation the dominating force in the global community. But, if you're not interested in international relations (how to rule over a principality), read this for its uncanny insight into the darkness of the human nature. Believe it or not, it is a great psychology tool. Of course its center stage is reserved for the leader of a monarchy. But then again forget about what's obvious and focus on what's written between the lines. Take for example the following statement:
"...men are wretched creatures who would not keep their word to you, you need to keep your word to them."
Here is the perfect example of how a mid-16th century writer characterizes the eternal and unchangeable human nature. Time and again he addresses the lack of trust one should put in people and how one is to handle his enemies. Many of us have already established our own framework of how to do this, but checking this framework against such a historical artifact would be extremely beneficial.
In addition, the book possesses a wealth of historical information on the topic of political strategy and to be fair - all of us can take advantage of a political lesson (especially in this day and age).
A short and quick read, I recommend it not only for its lessons, but for the mere fact that history deemed it worthy of preservation.
|
View all 12 comments |
|
|
|
|